Mexican General Law of Administrative Responsibilities

Mexican Whistleblowing Legislation: An Overview

For advice on how Safecall can help you with the Mexican General Law of Administrative Responsibilities (GLAR) compliance, call us on +44 (0) 191516 7720 or send us an email to info@safecall.co.uk. 

Return to legislation overview page

The Mexican General Law of Administrative Responsibilities (GLAR), enacted on 18 July 2016 and effective from 19 July 2017, is a cornerstone of Mexico’s comprehensive anti-corruption framework. This legislation aims to establish clear guidelines for the conduct of public servants and private entities, ensuring accountability and integrity across all levels of government and business operations.

Purpose and Scope

The primary objective of Mexican whistleblowing legislation is to combat corruption by holding public servants and private entities accountable for their actions. The law applies to all public officials at the federal, state, and municipal levels, as well as private individuals and companies involved in corrupt activities. By addressing both “non-serious” and “serious” administrative offences, the GLAR seeks to foster a culture of transparency and ethical behaviour in public administration and business practices.

Key Provisions

1. Definitions

The GLAR defines several key terms to clarify its scope and application:

• Non-Serious Administrative Offences: These include failures to uphold certain responsibilities of public officials, such as cooperating with judicial and administrative proceedings or reporting misconduct.
• Serious Administrative Offences: These encompass more severe acts of corruption, including bribery, embezzlement of public funds, and other corrupt practices.
• Public Servant: Any individual holding a position within the federal, state, or municipal government.
• Private Entity: Any individual or company engaged in business activities, particularly those interacting with public officials.

2. Administrative and Civil Liability

The GLAR establishes that both public servants and private entities can be held liable for corrupt practices. This liability is independent of any criminal proceedings and includes a wide range of corrupt activities, such as:

• Bribery: Offering, promising, or giving undue advantages to public officials to influence their actions.
• Bid Rigging: Manipulating public procurement processes to gain unfair advantages.
• Influence Peddling: Using one’s position to unduly influence the decisions of public officials.
• Improper Hiring: Engaging in the improper hiring of former public officials to gain undue advantages.

3. Penalties and Sanctions

The GLAR imposes severe penalties on individuals and entities found guilty of corrupt practices. These penalties include:

• Fines: Companies may face substantial fines, which can be a percentage of their gross revenue or a fixed amount, depending on the severity of the offence.
• Disqualification: Public servants may be disqualified from holding public office for a specified period.
• Suspension of Activities: Companies may face temporary suspension of their business activities.
• Asset Forfeiture: Confiscation of assets obtained through corrupt practices.

4. Compliance Programs

To encourage ethical behaviour, the GLAR promotes the implementation of compliance programs within private entities. These programs are designed to prevent and detect corrupt practices and include:

• Internal Controls: Establishing procedures to monitor compliance and detect potential violations.
• Ethics Policies: Developing and enforcing codes of conduct that promote ethical behaviour.
• Training Programs: Providing regular training to employees on anti-corruption laws and ethical standards.
• Whistleblower Mechanisms: Creating confidential channels for reporting suspected violations without fear of retaliation.

Reporting Mechanism

The GLAR provides a structured process for reporting suspected corruption. Whistleblowers can submit their complaints to the relevant authorities, including the Ministry of Public Administration (SFP) and the Federal Court of Administrative Justice (TFJA). The complaint must include details of the alleged wrongdoing, the identity of the individuals involved, and any supporting evidence.

Investigation Process

Upon receiving a complaint, the relevant authority conducts a preliminary review to determine the validity of the allegations. If the complaint is deemed credible, a detailed investigation is initiated. The authority has the power to summon witnesses, request documents, and take other necessary actions to gather evidence. The investigation process is designed to be thorough and impartial, ensuring that all allegations are properly examined.

Protection for Whistleblowers

Mexican whistleblowing legislation provides robust protections for whistleblowers to ensure their safety and livelihood:

• Confidentiality: The identity of the whistleblower is kept confidential throughout the investigation process.
• Prohibition of Retaliation: Any form of retaliation against a whistleblower is strictly prohibited. Individuals who retaliate against whistleblowers may face penalties, including fines and imprisonment.
• Legal and Financial Support: Whistleblowers may receive legal and financial support, including rewards, if their disclosures lead to significant public benefits.

Penalties for False Complaints

To prevent misuse of the GLAR, it includes provisions for penalising individuals who knowingly make false or frivolous complaints. Such individuals may face disciplinary action, including fines and imprisonment, ensuring that the law is used responsibly and in good faith.

Amendments and Updates

Since its enactment, the GLAR has undergone several amendments to enhance its effectiveness and address emerging challenges. Notable updates include:

• 2017 Amendment: This amendment introduced stricter penalties for serious administrative offences and expanded the scope of protections for whistleblowers.
• 2020 Amendment: This amendment clarified the procedures for handling complaints and strengthened the compliance requirements for private entities.

Challenges and Criticisms

Despite its comprehensive framework, the GLAR Mexican whistleblowing legislation has faced several challenges and criticisms:

• Awareness and Implementation: There have been concerns about the level of awareness among public servants and private entities regarding the provisions of the GLAR. Efforts are needed to ensure that all stakeholders are informed about their responsibilities and the available channels for reporting corruption.
• Effectiveness of Protections: Some critics argue that the protections for whistleblowers are not always effective, particularly in cases involving high-ranking officials. Ensuring consistent enforcement of the GLAR’s provisions remains a critical issue.
• Scope of Coverage: The exclusion of certain entities and individuals from the GLAR’s provisions has been a point of contention. Expanding the scope of the law to include all relevant stakeholders could enhance its overall effectiveness.

Impact and Significance

The GLAR has had a significant impact on promoting transparency and accountability within the Mexican public sector and business community. By providing a legal framework for reporting corruption and protecting whistleblowers, the law has encouraged more individuals to come forward with valuable information. This has led to the exposure of several high-profile corruption cases and has contributed to a culture of integrity within public administration and business practices.

Comparison with International Legislation

When compared to anti-corruption laws in other countries, the GLAR shares several similarities and differences:

• United States: The US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) provides comprehensive protections and incentives for whistleblowers, including financial rewards.
• United Kingdom: The UK Bribery Act 2010 offers strong protections for whistleblowers and covers both public and private sectors. The Act encourages disclosures by providing legal safeguards against retaliation.
• Brazil: Brazil’s Clean Company Act (Lei da Empresa Limpa) provides protections for whistleblowers in the public and private sectors and includes provisions for maintaining confidentiality and preventing retaliation.

Future Prospects and Reforms

To address the current limitations and enhance the effectiveness of the GLAR, several reforms have been proposed:

• Increasing Awareness: Implementing comprehensive training and awareness programs to ensure that all public servants and private entities are informed about their responsibilities and the procedures for reporting corruption.
• Strengthening Protections: Enhancing the protection measures to provide better safety and support for whistleblowers, particularly in high-risk cases.
• Expanding Coverage: Extending the scope of the GLAR to include currently excluded entities and individuals, ensuring comprehensive protection for all stakeholders.

Conclusion

The Mexican General Law of Administrative Responsibilities is a crucial piece of legislation aimed at promoting transparency and accountability within the public sector and business community. By providing a legal framework for reporting corruption and protecting whistleblowers, the GLAR has made significant strides in fostering a culture of integrity. However, ongoing efforts are needed to address its limitations and ensure robust protections for all stakeholders. As Mexico continues to refine its anti-corruption framework, the GLAR will remain a cornerstone of its efforts to combat corruption and promote ethical conduct in public administration and business practices.

How Safecall Can Help with the Mexican General Law of Administrative Responsibilities (GLAR) Compliance

Ensuring compliance with Mexican whistleblowing legislation is essential for maintaining market integrity and protecting both investors and employees. An external whistleblowing solutions provider like Safecall can significantly aid organisations in meeting their PID obligations. Safecall offers anonymous reporting channels, enabling employees to report suspicious activities without fear of retaliation. This encourages more employees to come forward with information about potential market abuse, ensuring that issues are identified and addressed promptly.

As an external provider, Safecall conducts independent and impartial investigations into reported incidents. This helps maintain objectivity and ensures that all reports are handled fairly and thoroughly, which is crucial for maintaining trust in the whistleblowing process. Additionally, Safecall provides comprehensive reporting and monitoring tools that help organisations track and manage whistleblowing reports. These tools offer valuable insights into potential compliance issues and help organisations identify patterns of misconduct, enabling them to take proactive measures to prevent market abuse.

Safecall also offers training and awareness programs to educate employees about MAR and the importance of compliance. These programs help foster a culture of integrity and transparency within the organisation, ensuring that employees understand their responsibilities and the procedures for reporting suspicious activities. By partnering with Safecall, organisations can ensure they are compliant with legal and regulatory requirements related to whistleblowing.

Implementing an external whistleblowing solution like Safecall enhances corporate governance by promoting ethical behaviour and accountability, thereby improving overall organisational integrity and stakeholder trust.